70th Anniversary of Accession to the Throne of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL) Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO): Strengthening Engagement Between Parliament and Civil Society in the Southern African Development Community (SADC)Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL) Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO): Strengthening Engagement Between Parliament and Civi...
On the Passing of Senator Edward W. Brooke
Carter Announces More U.S. Support for Afghan Forces : U.S. forces in Afghanistan now will be able to boost support for Afghan conventional ...
Service robots are coming to help us | NSF - National Science Foundation
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
WIN FOR 19 SUPERMARKET EMPLOYEES
FROM: U.S. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
A federal judge has ordered a Piggly Wiggly supermarket in Sheboygan, Wisconsin to restore full-time status and health insurance to employees whose hours were reduced to part-time without bargaining with their union, and to refrain from making such unilateral changes in the future.
At the request of the National Labor Relations Board, Chief Judge C.N. Clevert, Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin also ordered the supermarket to immediately offer reinstatement to four employees who resigned after their hours were reduced. The temporary injunction will continue until the underlying case is resolved by the NLRB.
According to a complaint issued by the NLRB Regional Office in Milwaukee, supermarket managers reduced the hours of 19 employees without notice, citing the impending opening of a non-union competitor nearby. The move to part-time status also resulted in the loss of health insurance.
Supermarket employees are represented by the United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 1473. At the time of the reduction of hours, Piggly Wiggly managers berated union officials for not helping the employees in letters that were posted on the bulletin board. Judge Clevert noted “the unilateral reductions, open hostility to the Union, [and] efforts to undermine the Union’s credibility” in issuing the injunction, which restores the Union’s bargaining position and requires that future changes to employee status be negotiated with the union.